Find a Lawyer

ARSHAD ULLAH versus MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK

Article 185 (3) Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), section 12 (2) filed by respondent was disposed of in favor of the High Court; the petitioners did not question the order of appeal before any higher forum and Appeared before the High Court instead. Under section 12 (2), the petition for re-seeking of the CPC and for the benefit of the applicants to revoke this order was dismissed by the High Court if the respondents were executed by the bank. If a new application has been filed, it will be subject to maintenance. Under the law allowing the same applicants, the Supreme Court was told that the order passed by the High Court on the application moved under Section 12 (2), CPC, Section 12 (2). There was no error in the discretion used by the High Court in dismissing the petition filed under. Especially when the High Court has clarified for the benefit of the applicants that a new execution petition will be applicable only before execution if it is readily available to the majority of the permitted reservations or objections. Can be requested before executing advocate from Choppar Hatta lawyer