Find a Lawyer

AALA MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Section 9 (c) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Recovery of evidence Recovery of 18 1/2 kg marijuana Evidence of police witnesses The trial court sentenced and sentenced the accused to life imprisonment. The suspects had appealed to the High Court that no independent witness was presented by the prosecution to prove the recovery and they did not know of the presence of hashish in the vehicle. The certification / checking and prosecution witnesses were members of the checking party, so in their presence there was a natural prosecution witness where the marijuana recovery was controlled by the vehicle / accused was driven by police personnel who were Like the other independent witnesses, there were competent witnesses simply because the evidence of the police witnesses could not be excluded. It was alleged that he was a policeman and could not travel in the car in his statement nor was he denied the use of the car in connection with the crime, as per Section 2342 CRPC. They were unable to be located, and it is a mystery that the prosecutor was able to prove his guilt by presenting his witnesses. Or illegal, false reading or exclusion of evidence in the High Court Petition decision jobs for advocates from Sheikhupura lawyer