Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SATTAR versus STATE THROUGH ADVOCATE-GENERAL N.-W.F.P.

Articles 409, 468, 419 and 420 of the Prevention of Corruption (Second of 1947), Section 5 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the prosecution relied primarily on official documents from documentary evidence. It turns out that the investigating officer's unproductive court had no prejudice to the accused as he was given the full opportunity to examine the relevant department's witness, but he questioned the credibility of the documentary evidence or Was unable to discredit the oral evidence presented by the prosecution. The Co-operative Society accepted and was run in the name of the President who died and was thus not legally constituted under the Co-operative Society Act, 1925, by the Co-operative Society certifying the authenticity of the Society. There was no legal status for getting a loan. The accused, therefore, had ample evidence of his involvement in the matter, to provide accurate information, but he deliberately presented an inaccurate and misleading report to the authorities concerned, damaging the government on the wrong benefit. And in the absence of any explanation for the accused of verifying the immorally wrong co-operative society. The loan was actually used by members of the Society, a strong speculation was made that they, together with the Society's Secretary-General, obtained a loan in the name of a society that was wrongly and illegally formed, As a result, the loan amount was misappropriated by any of the following courts. The accused was not subject to any legal or factual weakness or misrepresentation or defective reading and the Supreme Court. famous high court advocate from Jandanwala lawyer