FEROZE versus STATE
Section 302 (b) of the Law in this Martyrdom (10 of 1984), Article 121 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the accused admitted in the incident that he was seeking to kill the deceased under the tomb and The sudden outburst was seen as a compromise. In view of the provisions of Article 121 of the Law of Martyrdom with her unmarried older sister in her house, the burden of proving the said petition of 1984 was diverted to the accused, who she failed to prove. There were only women in the house at the time of the incident, but neither the accused's sister nor any other woman was presented in support of the defense plea that when the victim's death was committed, she wore a protective version of the dress. The nature and whereabouts of the wounds were confirmed. The victim advised that while he was convicted of contempt of court and sentenced to death under section 2302 (b), he was fast asleep while conducting contemporaneous decisions of both the courts under PPC. had lived. The appellant was discharged on appeal accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Hattar lawyer