AMIR BAKHSH versus MUHAMMAD RAFIQ
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/427 ocular account, presented by eye-witness witnesses who were closely related to the deceased, was subversive and of interest because there was suspicion of the presence of witnesses or indeed They saw that the presence of witnesses had no sharia guarantee or judicial certainty. At the time of the incident, there was a need for independent sovereignty of the statements of each of the accused witnesses, who was not recovering the investigation by the trial court for reasons that were stable, and the weapons allegedly recovered from the accused. Together, the forensic science was sent to the laboratory, therefore, they were not worth considering, so there is no plausible basis conv Until the conviction exists, the suspect was given the benefit of the doubt and was acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Kech lawyer