Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

AMIR BAKHSH versus MUHAMMAD RAFIQ


The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/427 ocular account, presented by eye-witness witnesses who were closely related to the deceased, was subversive and of interest because there was suspicion of the presence of witnesses or indeed They saw that the presence of witnesses had no sharia guarantee or judicial certainty. At the time of the incident, there was a need for independent sovereignty of the statements of each of the accused witnesses, who was not recovering the investigation by the trial court for reasons that were stable, and the weapons allegedly recovered from the accused. Together, the forensic science was sent to the laboratory, therefore, they were not worth considering, so there is no plausible basis conv Until the conviction exists, the suspect was given the benefit of the doubt and was acquitted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Usta Mohammad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.