REHMATULLAH versus MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ KHAN
Homeless Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act 1958 Section 21 Permanent Transfer (Houses and Shops) Rules, 1961, R2 (6) Permanent Transfer Order was issued in favor of the applicant, no appeal and review against the PTO. Not only was the petition requested, it did not have the effect of the remand order of the applicant approving the Settlement Commissioner to validate the transferred property number even if it was inadvertently in the PTO The Deputy Settlement Commissioner had no jurisdiction to correct any mistake or clearance error issued to the respondent. Interfere with the transfer order issued to the applicant or to distinguish the price paid by the applicant under the remand order
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Mehar lawyer
