MST. SALMA SHAHIDA versus STATE
Articles 9/4/420 / / Cor6868 / Act71 Cor Corruption Prevention Act (II 1947 1947 of II), Section (1) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Re-review of the evidence on corruption and The misappropriation of government funds due to the alleged misappropriation and misappropriation of the dancing officer, staff salaries, received so much wrong amount that employees who were not paid salaries, the prosecution testified. And the case was fully supported, according to the handwriting expert, the accused had forged some signatures on the documents. He was convicted and sentenced to nine months imprisonment and was also fined and the sentence given by the trial court was upheld by the High Court, the accused raised that he had returned the embezzled money and there There was no harm to the state exchequer. Such a request went against the accused because he had initially committed the misappropriation. The part of the government money could be temporary, but later, fear of being prosecuted. From, he received money that was misused by forgery of some employees' signature and tampering with records. In the case, the salaries of some people were paid by the accused, the prosecutor successfully proved the crime.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Chishtian lawyer