In his statement under Section 234 Cr, CRPC, the accused in connection with the examination of the evidence in section 2 (b (b)) acknowledged his presence in the house of the complainant and in a way strengthened the prosecution's case. The absence of a motive or failure to prove that motive would not have a negative impact on it. ?If the prosecution's case was proved by credible evidence, the suspect was equipped with a pistol on the spot. He was fully prepared that if he was stopped he would use the same way when the complainant entered the room and found the accused. The latter pulled out his pistol. And when the victim tried to stop him, he shot him dead, killing him, and there was enough evidence to prove the culprit, which was enough to stop the accused. The cause of death, which was born in his uterus, there was no chance of lower punishment for the second time the firearm was not repeated, the accused fired the fatal shot which led to his death. So, it didn't raise any questions. For this the benefit was enhanced but the minor age of the offender was not proved and in the circumstances the death sentence of the offenders was maintained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
