MUHAMMAD AYUB versus STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/148/149 The first information report was filed after the incident of nineteen hours but was delayed satisfactorily explained and at the same time in the statement of the complainant before the court, the eyewitnesses were not accused. That they might be falsely honored against the eyewitnesses, natural witnesses and their presence on the spot was very firm. They successfully tested the test and their statements were consistent with the probabilities and were materially relevant to the rest of the evidence and were not subject to material contradictions or major contradictions, or dishonest improvements to the eyewitnesses. Mentioned in the first information report. Section 161, CCPC and the court that they have identified the named accused of the four witnesses who match the number of injured received by the detainee and the injured, on the basis of the satisfaction of the accused. The available eyewitness testimony was available to confirm the defendants' conviction in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Fateh Pur lawyer