Find a Lawyer

IQBAL KHAN versus SHAHID ULLAH BEG

Regarding the nature of evacuation of the Pakistan (Administration for Evacuation Property) Act, 1957 sections 22 and 41 (ii) the evacuation of property and the homelessness Act (XIV of 1975), section 2 settlement scheme number IX, Chapter 1 In the Dispute Forum Authority property disposition decision, prior to the enactment of Act XIV of 1975, was exclusively based in Custodian under the provisions of Act XII of 1957, authorizing settlement and rehabilitation authorities to determine such disputes. The court was not required to determine the vacancy of the property after the eviction was canceled. Prior to the issuance of Ordinance XIV, the rules of the Settlement Scheme No. IX mode for determining the vacant nature of the property and, thereafter, stated that the evacuation dispute could be brought to Custodian in two ways, one The Act was under section 41 (II) of the Twelfth. Through the Civil Court of 1957 or any other authority where the question arose as to whether a property was vacant or not, all authorities were required to refer the question to the determination of Custodians. Secondly, in Article 22 of Act XII of 1957 It was stated that any person who claims any right or interest in any property by the Custodian or the Recovery Authority as a Student Property shall have the right to file an application before the Custodian. The Act XII questioned any vacant property, including a civil court, restoration authority or settlement authority. A five did not stop to settlement maintenance authorities nor the authorities have the powers to decide in respect of the dispute. The question of whether a property is vacant or not attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Khair Pur Mir lawyer