MUHAMMAD LATIF versus THE STATE
Section 23 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Sections 32 and 262 (2), in connection with the defendant's voluntary confession and the evidence of the prosecution, was tried in the court below which completed the accused's guilt. Proved and convicted and sentenced. Three months \ RI with the challenged penalty of the offense that the court below was authorized under section 262 (2), the CR PC was only able to impose a prison sentence but was not able to impose a fine, The accused was prosecuted for violation of Section 23. The Ordinance (VII of 1960), which gave the trial court the power to impose fines, as well as the imprisonment hearing, also allowed the trial court to pass any legal sentence with fines.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Kahror Pacca lawyer
