Find a Lawyer

SEEMA FAREED versus STATE

Sections 406, 420, 489F, 109, 114 and 34 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), in the prevention of proceedings, the High Court, upon a minute scrutiny of the record, concluded that the elements of the crime Charges have been leveled against. It would be neither fair nor appropriate to halt the criminal proceedings at the initial stage of the petitioner, the High Court had also dealt with the question of the registration of the provision of section 489F in the PPC approach. In the matter of stopping the proceedings, the High Court was neither unlawful nor faced any inherent legal weakness or material misconduct which led to the High Court justifying the termination of the contract as well as the law. , The law was not subject to any misunderstanding in the criminal case. It should be allowed to proceed on its own merits and was never considered merely because the civil proceedings relating to the same transaction were implemented. Be legal to maintain a criminal proceeding that can proceed at the same time as punishment for a criminal offense was a matter of civil liability because no question of law of public importance was raised in the facts and circumstances of the case. Was exercised by Article 185 (3) of the Constitution, and no interference with the exercise of its jurisdiction was guaranteed. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Gari Habibullah lawyer