Find a Lawyer

LAL MUHAMMAD versus YAR MUHAMMAD

Section 10 and 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Review of Evidence Delayed in Different Version of Abduction FIR Absolute Missing Prosecutor introduces different story of abduction in case related to version given in FIR The rent, which was filed with a delay but still according to the FIR version, was a matter of disappearance, the trial court and the Federal Shariat Court examined the facts and examined the evidence, finding that together The accused were not guilty and were acquitted; the Supreme Court will not intervene. There is no defect, unless it is shown that the recovery of the case has been obtained or that the evidence on record is being completely disregarded, that the two courts do not give sufficient weight to the evidence or evidence. Shows the coherence of the rejection. Evaluate eyewitness accounts appropriately or exclude to consider the absence of cause Failure to do justice resulted in false implications that result from the trial court's finding of acquittal and the Federal Shariat Court. Interview with the Supreme Court did not demand intervention, but the appeal was denied immigration advocates phone number from Pindi Bhattian lawyer