Find a Lawyer

ZIAULLAH ALIAS JAJJ versus STATE

Section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203F (2b) convinced that an FIR was lodged after a preliminary inquiry and that the allegations against Haraba were filed in the medical store intermittently. That eyewitnesses were not natural and probative witnesses whose statements contained improvements, contradictions, and contradictions. That the recovery of a criminal pistol from the accused in the presence of any independent witness was suspicious. That the test identification parade was faulty and had no identifiable value because the delay in conducting it was not satisfactorily described, the role of the accused was not stated by the witnesses, for each accused separately. The identity parade was not held and no such misrepresentation was made. ; And that the accused was sentenced to death on the evidence that his accomplice acquitted, the leave of appeal was allowed to consider the above convictions. top advocate from Dhirkot lawyer