Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHIQ versus STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 307/34 accused in his defense examined three free and unwanted persons who complained that the complainant and the person appearing as the eyewitness in this case were armed and The accused was assaulted in his house and was in self-defense that he fired. His leg was inspected by the witnesses shot at one of the assailants / complainant was not examined by the prosecution to any extent before the complainant was also charged by the accused. An IR was recorded which was canceled and the doctor was not examining the injured / complainant's wounds nor was he examined. Any reasonable grounds for secondary evidence were directed, that all such circumstances were taken with the seat of injury, that is, the lower part of the complainant's leg, was held, the defense was given substantial power. That the accused acted to exercise his right to a defense order. Canceling a case against the complainant and the prosecution witnesses will not prevent the accused from showing that he has acted on his use. The best course of litigation by the accused is to file an FIR against them. Go. law websites from South Wazirstan lawyer