ATA MUHAMMAD versus STATE
Corruption Prevention Act 1947 Section 409/201/34 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) reported on the accused was not recovered nor any evidence of its effect was found. That the accused was ever in special possession. The effect of the file on the evidence of the appellant was that on the day the case was registered, there was a co-accused who pulled out the sealed envelope and in the absence of direct evidence that he was found guilty of the accused, the complainant / Delivered to prosecution witness , It would not be safe to prove the appellate court, because carefully the appeal was accepted and the accused was ordered to be released.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Khanbel lawyer
