Find a Lawyer

MIR AFZAL versus STATE

Definition of sections 302 (c) and 308 evidence. Although the eye witnesses were interconnected and were also related to the deceased, there was no enmity with falsely trapping and replacing the accused, medical evidence fully supported the ocular version, which further confirmed the reports. Had happened The recovery of the experts' clothing also confirmed the prosecution's story and the evidence was not challenged by the defense FIR and there was no delay and the statement of the investigating officer had to be relied upon. Was the one who performed his duty. The routine of the events in which the doctrine of truth was connected was proved to be done by the prosecution. Was. And the complainant, who is a complainant, could not possibly falsely include his son's father-in-law, who was the father of three minor children, under penalty of perjury under Section 2302 (c) Due to this, Section 8308 was changed to PPC and he was sentenced to 14 years RI in addition to paying the dues. best advocate from Hasilpur lawyer