The accused accused of guaranteeing single and simple injury to the complainant with a sharp weapon in Section 497 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 324/337d of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act (VIII of 1974) It was declared that even if the prosecution case is considered true, the trial against the accused will not fall under the scope of the prohibition contained in section 497 (1). The witnesses were cited or did not need to be resolved. At this stage, the Supreme Court will question whether Section 324, PPC can be requested, after the prosecution has recorded the prosecution evidence in the case, after determining the seat and nature of the injury. , Currently the crime of the accused needs further investigation. In the circumstances of the accused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
