FARRUKH versus STATE
Section 497 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Section 42 bail, the Principals would not accept the admissible definition of evidence, considering the High Court's grant of bail, but only temporarily reviewed the evidence. Will go If, after a temporary assessment of the evidence, the court would conclude that the defendants had proved that they had committed the crime with the death penalty or life imprisonment, then the bail. I will discount. They have not been extended unless a reasonable basis can be established and further investigation into the crime is required. Generally, the High Court will not be interfered with at the discretion of the court unless arbitrarily so. Or used in a arbitrary manner
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Utror lawyer