GHULAM MUSTAFA versus A.C./COLLECTOR
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 conviction on the witnesses' statements, medical evidence and the retrieval of offensive weapons from the accused ocular witnesses was intriguing and unusual, as their statements required extreme care and coordination, but their Statements were not verified. Medical evidence was inconsistent with the medical evidence. The doctor did not enter the injured person's wounds on a printed form on paper, and the doctor presented the certificate to the Investigation Officer after five days of existence, medical evidence led to eyewitness accounts. Not confirmed The assailants used the sharp side of the hatchet, but the recovered stick was a blood stain that was not used at all. The hatchet recovery proved to be a fake that could not connect the suspect with the crime. The trigger to commit was not set up. FIR was not examined FIR was filed after consideration Environment, held, failed to prove case in circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Bhalwal lawyer