JAHANGIR SIDDIQUI & COMPANY LIMITED versus
Failure to submit periodically ical submissions of sections 246 and 476 section RO 865 (I) / 2000, dated 6 12 2000 account, information or other reports, the half yearly account of the relevant year showed that the company in that period Had invested equally. The companies affiliated with said that the investment in the affiliated companies on the basis of the resolution passed by the company's shareholders in the unusual general meeting company to comply with the terms of 6 12 2000 as per non-section RO 865 (I) / 2000. I have failed. The Company's effect was to provide the shareholders with the information required at the general meetings of the Company after the Company's effect was to keep the shareholders informed and provide full details of their decisions to safeguard their interests. In the present case, the shareholders should have been informed of the meetings of the decision. Details of the decision were failed by the relevant company officials considering the track record of the company and keeping in mind that the company had to hold the next general meeting of the shareholders. Instead of banning the terms of the notification, specify their position in compliance with the requirements of the notification, company officials were advised to comply with the law in the next letter and spirit. \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Chaghi lawyer