Find a Lawyer

NISAR AHMED versus CAPITAL CITY POLICE OFFICER

Section 5 and 12 of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 Reverse Appellant Appellant, serving as a Junior Clerk in the Deputy Inspector General Police Office, applied for the post of Assistant Sub Inspector, whose request was Inspector General. Was sent to For the pending appointment, the appellant was deployed in the Police Training School to undergo A-Section I PS training and, during training, the appellant was appointed Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police Appellant, who successfully. Had completed his training and began performing his duties as A Section I. The police, but suddenly, after giving a show cause notice to the appellant, he was returned to the appointment of a Junior Clerk Appellant as Assistant Sub Inspector Police, but this was not a change of cadre. The appellant's case was the change of cadre from the position of junior clerk to the position of A Section IP, which was not under the law. Is valid and it is for this reason that the appellant was returned to his junior clerk position. The intelligence of the authorities was misconstrued and the officer exercised autonomous powers which, under the law, allowed him to be reversed in the absence of the appellant. There was no legal value under the law, the appellant had already acquired a legal, valuable and personal right in his favor, which was the law of the luxury of capitalism, that is, the power to decline until the decisive action was taken, officially. Unpublished orders were not available under which the appellant was returned, for lack of sustainability, they were set aside attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Tobatek Singh lawyer