Find a Lawyer

FAQIR MUHAMMAD LEGHARI versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, KARACHI

RR4 (1) (b) (iv), 5 and 6 of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), for the dismissal of section 4 service, from the applicant after the charge sheet related to the fines and the allegations of inquiry against him. A dismissal order was imposed. Fraud, misappropriation, misappropriation of public money, tampering with office records, and the inquiry against appellant against Tetra were not done in accordance with the prescribed rules of law because there was no interim examination of witnesses against the appellant. Opportunity was not provided, nothing was on record to indicate. If the witnesses were examined in the presence of the appellant, the inquiry report of the appellant's involvement in the return of the GP fund of the two teachers did not prove that the two teachers in their statements before the inquiry officer stated that The appellant and his co-accused were involved in fraud, misuse, misappropriation of public money and tampering with office records, in the absence of any positive evidence. Imagination can be used as a piece of evidence against the appellant; there was no direct or circumstantial evidence against the appellant regarding the involvement of the GP Fund's return of both teachers; allegations of misconduct, circumstance I was not proven against the appellant, the charges were laid aside, the orders were put aside and the appellant was ordered to be reinstated, ly r \ n best law firm from Wazirabad lawyer