Find a Lawyer

YAQOOB MASIH versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/323/148/149 was immediately listed in the first information report, which specifically mentioned the names of the accused, their used weapons and the persons who were injured and the prosecution witnesses. And this was not the result of the conversation The eye witness / complainant actually shows that this incident is not of any previous enmity with eyewitnesses, eyewitness version is reliable, confident and all present conditions I support that. The court said the suspect was present on the scene and prosecutors' witnesses said he was in fact involved. The facts stated by the witnesses have revealed that the accused, along with the co-accused, had objected to the possession of the tube well from the complaining party. Demonstrating power, the Templars both rose to the sidelines and the accused used their weapons against the complaining party. The allegation that he used the person's right to self-defense as baseless alleges that the complaining party was empty-handed and further argued that the defendant's case was made under Section 300, exception IV. There was no qualification, therefore, that the accused, who did not agree to the prerequisite of exceptions, fired at his gun with the gun and was actually sentenced to death under Section 302/149, the Code of Conduct, and his death sentence. Retained. list of advocates from Ambela lawyer