Find a Lawyer

SHAUKAT KHALID versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, RAWALPINDI

The stranger resisted the claim of custody of the minor by the Guardians and Wards Act 1890 section 25, whereby such a minor father was in custody of his minor daughter to his brother, who had killed his brother. Later, claiming to be back in custody of his father. His minor had expressed his preference for his brother's wife to live with his uncle's wife, no doubt, but in the direct influence of the mamas, in regard to the welfare of the minor menu. The same should be decided with that. His wife, and apparently his broken mind, made brutal accusations against his parents for threatening to kill him instead of going to his parents and showing no hatred between the minor and the real parents. Could go The claim that the minor was in custody of the minor in preference to the father of the minor was not a matter of fact, that the applicant had raised the minor child in regard to his childhood and his deep affection. Did not convey the right to claim custody of the minor, staying with his uncle's wife, no doubt, relevant but not final. Decision regarding the welfare of a minor minor, which is a risk and his welfare cannot imagine the risks and life of the court, while exercising parental jurisdiction in the context of each case in the minor. Wellness has to be decided. Where the minor was practically living after death. His uncle was a family in which Christianity was accepted us immigration advocates from Hub Chowki lawyer