Delay in filing FIRs of Pakistan Penal Code Sections 392 and 397 robbery was fully stated The independent eyewitness testified that there was no enmity with any false involvement, Successfully tested the test and its statements did not suffer from material weaknesses. Contradictions / major contradictions or dishonest improvements When the police bring the accused to the scene, the witnesses identified him as one of the robbers; there was no need and no need for a parade to identify the accused. Was caught with the tractor. The accused who arrested the police officer were found to have no motive in falsely involving the accused because the statement of such police officer could not be denied because of his office and when His statement did not indicate any legal weakness, so there were statements from the witnesses and the police officer. The trial court properly appreciated the record by working with the rest of the evidence and surrounding circumstances in accordance with the probabilities and the material fit. It was alleged that he was not guilty of the crime through credible evidence, it was alleged, one of the robbers committed robbery.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
