The statement of one of the witnesses was recorded on the occasion of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/307/148/149, stating that the eyewitness was examined at length, but the defense failed to shake his credit, The eyewitness who was present at the confession and saw the incident, even if it is considered a witness on the occasion as the accused allegedly did, provided a satisfactory explanation of his presence, and his The statement served as contentious evidence to bolster the testimony of the other eye witness, the other eye witness was also a natural witness, in his home The testimony of Rah's testimony, therefore, could not be taken lightly, that the role attributed to the accused was inadvertently firing and raising Lalcaris, based on the presence of the accused at the scene of the incident and their statements attributed to the overt act. was done. Of the witnesses, the suspects were allegedly liable and were punished less because they announced that the culprits had made themselves. In legal proceedings against their common object by ineffectively firing and engaging in racketeering and maintaining the conviction of the ordinary accused / appellant.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
