Find a Lawyer

KHALIL AHMED versus STATE

Sections 11 and 10 (3) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), section 21 (3) (a) define the evidence as the main accused was capable of contracting the marriage 90 days after the recovery of the alleged abductor. A copy of the Chairman's decree to dissolve the marriage, as stated in section 21 (3) (a) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964), is the documentary evidence that laid the basis of the prosecution case on record. Destroyed because the kidnapper was the main accused's legally married wife, the main accused's real brother, so on the day of the alleged incident, the adulteress could not be involved in committing the crime with her sister and she was also the main accused. In the knowledge for which a complex and lengthy legal battle was fought, the question of Xena Bill Jaber did not arise when the kidnappers repeatedly found themselves central. M was admitting to be the wife of the prosecution version, who had gained a central position in the whole trial, not only to be discernible but also to be securely dependent on coordination and impossibilities. The statement of facts should be natural and appealing to the wise cannot possibly be questionable, untrustworthy or based on the accused's guilt. The suspect was acquitted of a suspicious story law websites from Abdul Hakim lawyer