Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN CYCLE INDUSTRIES COOPERATIVE SOCIETY, LAHORE versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Establishment of Office of Sections 32 (3A), 179 (3) and 206 Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XVX of 2000), Section 2 (3) Section RO 436 (I) / 01, Date 18 6 2001 Section R O 434 (I) / 01, Deletion of unauthorized statement, error, etc. The demand for duty and tax against imports on the basis that import of components at the rate of duty concession for local manufacture of motorcycle is permitted. And the importer failed to receive the delete program. Due to the failure to obtain the 8004% elimination program in the Delegation Program, imported components violating the DESI program will attract legal and tax rates on CBU vehicles because of the exception. Development was only available at the annual annual indigenous structure acquisition. At the same time, the appellant verifying the appeal had actually filed an appeal against the order before the collector appeal, which was pending the final decision. The department neither disclosed the basis on which the cost and duty / tax calculation. The book / determination was not made nor did they provide the formula applied before the decision was made and the price and duty amount and the taxes that were arbitrarily agreed were not agreed upon by the complainant. Had already made interim stay against the receipt of such amount from the appellate tribunal. The central appeal was still pending before the collector appeals. The complainant can discuss with the complainant the same as the Collector Appellate Authority, which is capable of resolving both the law and the facts of the case without any defect in the complainant's defense. After considering, the matter will decide on the merits. from observing advocate from Chicha watni lawyer