Find a Lawyer

AMANA TEXTILE versus SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 36 (1) (3) and 11 (4) constitutes the Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), the collection of section 2 (3) tax that has not been levied or levied. Or a tax demand and liability refund under section 36. (1) In addition to the Sales Tax Act, 1990, the appeal against the Collector of Appeal, along with the appeal of additional taxes and penalties, was decided against the decision of the President of Pakistan, which issued the call notice on 15-12 2003. And the case was decided on December 30. After the expiration of the 90-day original term set forth in Sections 11 (4) and 36 (3) of the Sales Tax Act, 2005, in 2005 the decision-making period was never extended / approved. The order was affected by time. The collector and the appellants failed to consider the issue of dismissal and did not even acknowledge the Federal Tax Ombudsman The results obtained by the Presidential Order, date of the original 5 original 2005 order, fell under the time bar. Illegal and illegal orders were also not legally sustainable in the appeal because it failed to maintain the order according to time constraints and a financial system was established to provide justice, the Federal Tax Ombudsman recommended That the Revenue Division should be directed to the competent authority to actually regulate and repeat the illegal order. Issue an order. Appeal under the provisions of Section 45A of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, and actually revoke the order, as well as cancel the appeal to retain the above-mentioned restriction order. ? And may proceed in accordance with the provisions of the law of r \ n \ r \ n famous lower court advocate from Chashma lawyer