Find a Lawyer

SHAHNAWAZ TEXTILE LTD., LAHORE versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 74 Sales Tax Rules, 2006, R28 (2) Section RO 1204 (I) / 07, dated 11 12 2007 Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance of Office of Establishment (XXV of 2000), time-limit amount The return file of the return file was returned to the Department on the basis that its return, which was filed, did not appear in the Department's system, upon verbal advice of the computer programmer, the Complainant made a revised Return submitted because pre-submitted and recognized return data was not available in the system. And the delay in the filing of the retraction claim was also not allowed on the basis of the delay in the registration of the retraction claim on the basis that in the case of revised returns in accordance with the provisions of section RO 1204 (I). Testing facility unavailable. / / 2007, dated 11.12 2007 Complaint claim is complicated because of the fact that the return was filed and acknowledged due to non-functioning of the computer system and was not uploaded. ? As a result of the computerized system the return data was not available to attach a refund claim and that the complainant was misled by the staff to file a revised return on the fact that the authorized authority It should be noted that the complainant had filed the original withdrawal in question and the supporting documents, which were also validated, were submitted within a period of time, within sixty days of the filing of the return and the claim for processing of the qualification. Even if the complainant's case is considered under Section R for the postponement of the delay. Anna was. And then us immigration advocates from Phagwar lawyer