Find a Lawyer

ALI ARSHAD versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INTERIOR, ISLAMABAD

Article 2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petitioner was named in the Exit Control List on the pretext that it violated the rules and regulations of the Department where he served the contract for about seven to seven months. Were given. The applicant was going abroad for higher education, without any reason, for any reason, on suspicion, or in exchange for a one-month notice on the government contract, and the department had to resign. Accepted, subject to payment. In exchange for the notice, the applicant was ordered to terminate the applicant upon approval of his resignation for the month's basic salary. The applicant was not involved in any noticeable activity and the project on which he was working did not suffer due to resignation only he had seven months on the Exit Control List because of the name of the applicant, a sensitive project. Holding the accuracy of the services, the department had to formulate a policy to keep an employee clearly on notice that the contract was terminated on time or by resigning, leaving it abroad for a specific period. Will be withheld, in the absence of such clause in the Agreement, no person shall be bound by this Agreement. To be prevented from pursuing higher education abroad, there was no material available on record against the applicant in any way affecting the state or affecting prejudice for the benefit of the country; And the order to name the applicant was put aside on the Exit Control List. \ R \ n lawer from fb area from Kashmore lawyer