Find a Lawyer

DR. MUHAMMAD AMIN versus AFTAB ASLAM

13 17 17 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application The candidate for the Educational Institutions Examination was presented by the college with a notice, under which he should appear in another professional. Blocked from. Examination Validity College Administration had no authority to restrain from attending other professional examinations under Rr 13 & 17 of the Council of Pakistan Administration of Medical and Dental Council Rules. As per the rules of the college administration, the candidate has to complete his MB, B section education. Within a maximum period of seven years; and in the present case, due to repeated failure of the candidate, he could not complete his first and second professions in a timely manner so his name was canceled from the college role and It was proposed that the candidate be allowed to attend the next examination only. Submission of an offer is subject to clearance of the said test on the first attempt, during which the college administration has allowed the college administration to sit the examination, meanwhile, under section 12 (2) of the CPC ) Had submitted that the lawyer appearing for the college had declared the college's interest unauthorized and harmful and had set a false vision for the future which would cause serious problems to the college administration as a The college administration presented the result in court, which said that the candidate failed once again despite his counsel regarding the candidate during the proceedings. However, he appealed to the court that the principal of this college could be summoned to resolve the dispute because the future of a candidate was at stake, famous supreme court advocate from Naukot lawyer