Find a Lawyer

MUKHTAR AHMAD versus NAZIR BIBI

The Code of Civil Procedure 1908 Section 114 review case was referred to the trial court through a decision passed in the Civil Revision, with the instruction that any evidence entered during any period is under consideration of the order of the District Judge. Could not come up so there could be fresh evidence. The trial court was directed to dismiss the recorded plea / plea in lieu of the recorded evidence within the said period, if the motion was made by any party in accordance with the law, which was before the respondents before the appellate court. The appeal memo filed by was not disposed of. The memorandum of review petition filed in the High Court also made it clear that both of them had decided on specific grounds that the petition moved by the applicants for comparison of the impression of the thumb was not dealt with by the trial court. There was action, because the main case in this case was the case. The filing of the thumb impression that was transferred for comparison to the document whose originality was being challenged should have been resolved by the trial court through an express order, something to establish the opinion of the applicant's lawyer. There was no record of him being released or abandoned because of the fact that his premise was not valid. The order approved in the amendment to review the decision passed in the review was modified to the extent that the trial court would exclude the respondent's request for comparing the impression of the thumb by express order. list of advocates from Chowk Azam lawyer