Find a Lawyer

NAZIR KHAN versus STATE

Section 497 Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 395, 458 and 412 bail, after obtaining stolen mobile phone records, the accused was denied, investigation and recovery of the stolen articles from the accused and their persons. , Cash and cell phones were affected. Regular identification of the articles was made by his complainant, but no hostility came on the record that the record of improperly trapping the accused has been revealed that the accused was also involved in other matters of the same nature. The habitual offender is a habitual offender. It seems that under the law at bail, deep appreciation was not guaranteed. The only bird sighting to be made was sufficient material available on record to believe that the accused had committed the crime that was committed under the prohibition clause of section 497, the CCP challan presented in court bail. Was rejected r \ n immigration advocate from Multan lawyer