Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

IKRAM ULLAH versus STATE


Sections 497 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 223 and 224 of the Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) bail, the grant of offenses with which the accused was charged under Section 5 (2). The Anti-Corruption Prevention Act, 1947, was guaranteed. The prosecution failed to collect any evidence related to the charge of obtaining an invoice that was unlawfully agreed, although presented in court, but no progress was made in the trial. Had not been, the arrest of the accused at the trial stage would not serve any useful purpose and would amount to money. Without conviction, the accused was given bail, in keeping with the principle of consistency, the accused were entitled to the same privileges, the accused was also allowed in the bail.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Khanbel lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.