Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAVEED versus STATE

Apart from the statement of Section 497 (2) Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302/109/148/149, the grant of further inquiries, no further evidence against the accused was available. ?????? While there was no solid evidence on record against the accused during the investigation, he was declared innocent and placed by Column No. 2 by the Investigation Officer, but was summoned in Column No. 3 on the direction of the District Attorney. , Deep testimony of the evidence was not guaranteed. At the bail-out stage, the law and only temporary assessment can be made on the basis of material collected during the investigation by the police, which led to a direct confrontation between medical and ocular evidence, which made the case for the accused while the police. Upon further investigation, there was an epoxy dickshot. The court is not bound, however, at the time of bail it can be considered as relevant factors The same role was assigned to the co-accused, who, after being declared innocent by the police, was tried by the trial court. The bail application was withdrawn, the police search could not be changed by the district attorney and he could not play the role of police investigator investigating the accused's innocence, based on the statements of these persons, They were the same area and had nothing to do with the accused, while the only basis for the search for a district attorney, the investigating officer. The co-accused was to find the alternative which was not guaranteed under the law, bail was accused bail conditions property advocates from Musafir Khana lawyer