WAHCCD ULLAH KHAN versus MUHAMMAD HANIF CH.
Sections 2 (g) (j), 17 and 24 of the Cantonment Rental Act Act 1963, the landlord and the tenant-proof appellant / tenant relationship deny the tenant to be a tenant under the defendants / landlords and this claim was made. That the plaintiffs do not exchange the disputed premises in the possession of the appellants. The High Court finally decided in the last litigation between the parties, under which the Department had from the beginning considered the two properties as property and the appellant was transferred to the upper part. While respondents were allowed to move to the lower part, the High Court further made it clear that appellant / tenants could not be allowed at the bottom of any part, again for appellant / tenants. Was not open to do or to open the case which ultimately stood and finally decided that the appellants Be selected. There was no landlord and tenant relationship between the parties as respondents could not prevail in the disputed premises transfer situation.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Taxila lawyer
