Find a Lawyer

NADEEM HAMEED SHAIKH versus STATE

Section 497 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 489F bail, the defendant's refusal to issue a check to the complainant was admitted, however, the defendant's lawyer's primary pressure was that the check was only issued and only Nothing was mentioned as security. Even if it was believed that the check was given as security, he imposed a responsibility on the accused, who issued the same lawyer for the accused, who failed to say what he had done to the Security Council. As for the accused, the need to issue a check through the Security Council claimed that the complainant sold the shares to the company and the accused was not liable to pay the amount to the complainant if the accused purchased the shares. , Then why did he issue the check in the deep? The definition of evidence was not appropriate at the bail-out stage, a huge amount of check was issued by the accused, who was a businessman and fully aware of the result of issuing the check. It was in these circumstances that the accused executed the agreement, which was also being issued, mentioning that the Security Council for the accused was also tried to argue that the check was issued under severe, unreasonable pressure. Was reported, but no report was filed by the defendants. He said the suspect had to think that the suspect was specifically named in the FIR and that there was enough material for the record, he was dismissed before the civil suit filed by the accused, The court may refuse bail in this offense. The prohibition clause of section 749 the was not reached, the CRPC accused on it list of supreme court advocates from Chaininda lawyer