Find a Lawyer

EJAZ AHMAD KHAN versus SHAUKAT ALI

A. XXXII, R 3 In the Punjab Pre-Emission Act (of 1913), the 15 and 21 cases against minors in the appointment of guardian ad rank were some of the defendants, the minor and the plaintiffs, who suggested that the guardian ad litem to the larger plaintiff. There was also a petition with the plaintiff for appointment of guardian of the minor defendants: On refusing to act as the minor defendant's minor defendant's guardian, the court appointed the Reader's Court as guardian Written statement was inserted and later the father of the minors was also appointed as their guardian on the appointment of guardian of the minor defendants. The defect was found to be common to the minor defendants, who was the real brother and co-owner of the minors and who was taking part in the proceedings, there was no prejudice, minor defendants and the prosecution. Was not due to The trial court's decision on the defendant's hypertechnical objection cannot be ruled out that the defendant did not appoint the appropriate defendant. Ian's ad for minor defendants since such a case was ineligible law websites from Mubarik Pur lawyer