Find a Lawyer

ARSHAD ALI KHAN versus S. M. ISMAIL

A. XXXVII, Plaintiffs' Rule 2 and 3 of the suit for recovery of money on the basis of an unannounced check were that the agreement could not be reached between the parties to the establishment of a fuel station on the plot of the PAF as the site leased to the defendant. The PAF has refused to give up. Of the amount promised to pay compensation to the plaintiff, the defendant issued a check, which was insulted, the request raised on the defendant's leave request was that there was no jurisdiction for the case filed at venue 1 Where there was no cause for action or not. The check was issued and no bank was located. Defendant's case against the plaintiff is pending at the \ K \ where the check was issued and the bank was located. And the plaintiff received the check from the defendant under the compulsion with the help of the designated officers of PAF. During the trial, the defendant discharged the defendant for the conditional defense of the bank guarantee. The defendant had raised a questionable defense or showed a credible question of law. And the fact that the trial case was not valid in approving an unlawful order. immigration advocates contact from Badin lawyer