versus
Correction of correspondence between the Additional Commissioner and the Commissioner of Commissioner Income Tax under Section 122A and 122 (5A) Section 122A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, which violates the aforesaid provisions by the Commissioner of Income Tax. ? Under the terms of the jurisdiction under the aforesaid section, a demand was sought for a record of the proceedings under the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 or under the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, which was sought by any taxation officer other than the Commissioner. An order was passed. Appeals) While in the present case the correspondence between Additional Commissioner and Commissioner Income Tax was fully and vigorously observed by the Commissioner for passing the amendment order under Section 122 (5A) of the Income Tax Ordinance. First pressure and additional commissioner was directed. , 2001, and the refusal to do so by the Additional Commissioner has long discussed the ion and the Commissioner requesting the provisions of Section 122A of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, Section 99 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 (3) Refund order approved under 170 / Canceled by canceled amendment order. Section 122A of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, which cannot be called automotive
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Tharo Shah lawyer