Find a Lawyer

versus

Sections 66 (c), 79, 132 and 62 In some cases the limitation for assessment is to set aside one of the two appeals cases, by the Assessing Officer before the appellate authority on two grounds only under the provisions of section 79 of this order. Was filed against. On the implementation of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 and second, the Workers' Welfare Fund, the First Appellate Authority set aside the matter for the application of the provisions of Section 79 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, and its Order dated 30 30 2001 According to which the increase was excluded. The Department of Workers' applicant Welfare Fund had just filed an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal on the issue of Worker Welfare Fund compensation which was not appealed on section 79 of the Income Tax Ordinance of 20 6 2002. The Appellate Tribunal, which was filed by the Department before 1979, means that the Department has accepted the order approved by the first Appellate Authority Providence. Section 66 (c) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 specifically states that if an appeal is preferred against an order which is fully or partially placed and in relation thereto Further appeal is preferred either under section 134 or under section 136 will not impose the limitation provided under section 66 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, then the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979; Had not fully or partially handled the case, so submitting a reference request through them later. Before the High Court, the Department shall not remove the limit provided under section 66 of the Income Tax Ordinance, the order passed by the Appellate Tribunal, 1979 Pakistan, top advocate family court from Gawadar lawyer