versus ZAFAR IQBAL
Section 3 (1A), 23 and 73 Further Taxes Tax Receipts Not Applicable Some appellants did not touch the violation of Sections 23 and 73 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, which were mentioned in the showcase notice that they Details were not provided or proof of payment nor was any evidence provided that the registered person has to supply the goods to another unregistered person who is responsible for registering, to give a sales tax invoice. The requirement was, according to the information given, and to receive the sale proceedings in excess of Rs. 50,000 b. To stress the device was received by respectively the Department had failed to prove the sales tax invoice Sales Tax Act 1990 was under 23 and sales revenue amounting tool to have a conversation. He said that the full names of buyers and brokers and with any proof that these persons were the actual buyers. The ND was above the minimum threshold for registering these individuals under the Sales Tax Act 1990.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Jehanian lawyer