Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

versus ZAFAR IQBAL


Section 3 (1A), 23 and 73 Further Taxes Tax Receipts Not Applicable Some appellants did not touch the violation of Sections 23 and 73 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, which were mentioned in the showcase notice that they Details were not provided or proof of payment nor was any evidence provided that the registered person has to supply the goods to another unregistered person who is responsible for registering, to give a sales tax invoice. The requirement was, according to the information given, and to receive the sale proceedings in excess of Rs. 50,000 b. To stress the device was received by respectively the Department had failed to prove the sales tax invoice Sales Tax Act 1990 was under 23 and sales revenue amounting tool to have a conversation. He said that the full names of buyers and brokers and with any proof that these persons were the actual buyers. The ND was above the minimum threshold for registering these individuals under the Sales Tax Act 1990.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
solicitors from Attock lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.