Find a Lawyer

versus

Sections 131, 154 and 162 Short deduction in export tax on goods Appellate Tribunal Appellant / Taxpayer, who was an exporter of dry dates, was saddened by the order passed by the tax officer under section 162 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Order. In an appeal before the Commissioner Income Tax (Appeals), the Commissioner canceled the order issued by the Taxation Officer on the wrong service of the showcase notice; both the taxpayer and the Income Tax Department approved the Appeal by the Commissioner Income Tax (Appeals). Appeals before the Tribunal ) The assertion of the taxpayer's advice was that the Commissioner did not pass the Speaking Order and the Commissioner should have canceled the Taxation Officer's order instead of canceling the representative of the same department that the Commissioner was not authorized to cancel the Taxation Officer's order. Because the showcase notice was served to the person who received almost all other matters, the retaliation by the Taxation Officer Commissioner Income Tax (Appeal) was canceled by the tax officer on the order issued by the Assessing Officer. The cause notice was not properly presented to the taxpayers. But he did not explain the facts as to how he came to the conclusion that the showcase notice was not properly presented to the taxpayer department representative who claimed that the bereavement notice was given to the person. Who had been receiving almost all other correspondence. Was made by the tax officer, he did not even identify the person and did not present any relevant evidence in support of his defense, to meet the pursuit of justice famous supreme court advocate from Hasilpur lawyer