KHAISTA KHAN versus KARACHI WATER AND SEWERAGE BOARD THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR/EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KARACHI
A. VII, R 11 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Articles 42 and 54 of the suit prosecuting plaintiffs could not seek a declaration to do any business they deemed appropriate licenses or plaintiff's relevant authorities. Could not run without permission. In the present case, contradictory requests were accepted, because on the one hand they stated that no NOC or permission was required and on the other hand a license was prepared from the local authorities which was not renewed by the plaintiff. The announcement did not demand that he deserve it. Holding the renewal of his ongoing license, since the plaintiff had no license to keep the business, the declaration and order cannot be allowed to be suspended and there will be no motive for postponing the case and for no reason. do not have. To maintain this case, the plaintiff was rejected under O VII, R 11, CPC.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from South Wazirstan lawyer
