INDUSTRIAL CLOTHINGS (PVT.) LTD versus ABDUL REHMAN
Sections 46 and 47 (3) of the Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders), Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section O15 (2) (4) Appeal for the Service Complaint Complaint dismissal, which employ on grounds of corruption Was dismissed, filed a complaint against dismissal, was allowed and ordered to be laid off. The employer filed an appeal against the Labor Court order, and the matter was remanded in labor court because the Labor Court's presiding officer concluded in his decision. No cross-examination of employee's testimony cross-examination of employee's testimony was not marked as no person was found to be present for the employer. The matter was remanded to the Labor Court on record of the case. Opportunity to provide the employer with an opportunity for a fresh examination of the evidence and a cross-examination of the employee's testimony ???? Examine without a proper purpose, then the appropriate order is passed and the matter decided by the same period. What's inside \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Khushab lawyer