Find a Lawyer

MAQSOOD AHMED QURESHI versus MUHAMMAD AZAM ALI SIDDIQUI

The complaint was dismissed by the trial court under section 3 (2) of the Section 3 Criminal Procedure Code (V 1898), Section 439 Illegal Settlement Act, 2005, directing the applicant to occupy the house in dispute. Refer to the civil court, as he failed to disclose his ownership of the property. Applicant's claim that he had possession of the landlord was due to a sale agreement between him and that the plaintiff had specifically alleged in his complaint that he had been evicted. Respondents also illegally imposed a general power of attorney on behalf of the applicant, which was regularly registered by the respondent from the said house, which was formally registered by the Civil Court. Was to prevent the respondent from expelling the applicant from the house in the questionnaire report. The relevant section HA disclosed that in the absence of all the petitioner, the defendant had occupied the said house illegally and the facts established a first case in favor of the applicant, which was illegal and unlawful disposal. Was applied in all cases of illegal and unlawful disposal, except in those cases where judicial decisions are pending, a preliminary case was filed in favor of the applicant. The impugned decision was declared illegal before the applicant complainant was legally prohibited from maintaining both civil and criminal proceedings simultaneously at the time of the submission of any forum and the case was prosecuted by law. To deal with the merit immigration advocate from Naukundi lawyer