Find a Lawyer

SYED IRFAN AHMED versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, FINANCE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD

Sections 7 and 8 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Appeal to Distinguish Right Despite the recommendation of the Pakistan Banking and Finance Services Commission, the relevant authority did not issue applicants the appointment, while other candidates recommended by the Commission. It was also submitted by the authorities that the appointment of the applicants was not made by the federal government due to the restrictions on recruitment and furthermore that the applicants had no right to claim their appointment if the appointment. Was appointed by the Commission to recruit them and for their appointment on the recommendation of the Commission. That the relevant authority has incorporated any right in the recommendations; such right of recommendation cannot be assigned, denied or challenged without any proper and proper reason, even by the government imposing a ban on recruitment. Neither can be invoked as a defense by the Authority. The recommendation that the Authority for the appointment of successful candidates failed to assign any reasonable, reasonable and justifiable reason for exempting the applicants from the legitimate right of their appointment under the defense of sanctions to the relevant Government, The defense was not available. To the relevant authority, before the government imposed any sanctions, the applicants were declared successful and eligible for the positions for which they applied, and only the department formally issued their appointments. There was yet to be seen. The Commission was also recommended to the applicant along with the relevant authority, the appointment was made by the authority, as the relevant authority had requested how to become a advocate from Quetta lawyer