Find a Lawyer

SAEED-UR-REHMAN versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY

Section & & Constitution Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Removal of Constitution Petition De Novo Inquiry Service Retirement was removed from employment due to misconduct by the applicant initially on modified pay and pensions etc. , But it was stated that the removal order was set aside. The appellant and the applicant were reinstated, subsequently a de novo inquiry was made against the applicant and the competent authority, while applying the effective theory, the applicant was immediately retired from the job with effectual authority, however not. Not only failed to determine the applicant's salary, but also failed to issue the applicant's pension fund's proceedings, finalization and issuance on the basis that the applicant had manipulated his or her date of birth, causing the applicant Was given a charge sheet alleging that he was born with a diamond Ray is about to, but was excluded from the charge as the investigating officer who was not told that the applicant was found guilty of the charge, to provide the applicant with no opportunity for an investigation or hearing. The birth authority could not afford to lose the benefit of pension funds only on the allegations of manipulation, in which case, after fixing, pensions were ordered to be processed, finalized and released. Pay according to the order passed by the department Pakistan, top advocate family court from Machh lawyer